How to think about Process Types
- Authors
-
-
Surajit Barua
Seth Anandram Jaipuria CollegeAuthor
-
- Keywords:
- Process Reliabilism, Process Types, Generality Problem, Justification
- Abstract
-
Process Reliabilism, originally formulated by Goldman as a theory of justification, faces the generality problem. Any particular belief is a process token/instantiation of a large number of broader or narrower process types, each having a distinct level of reliability. The problem is to select the unique, repeatable type. This is now considered a major problem for process reliabilism. In this paper, I examine the structure of processes in general, apply the understanding obtained from that fresh perspective on process types to analyse the Generality problem and conclude that, when properly interpreted, William Alston's solution proposed in 1995 is the right candidate for solving it.
- Downloads
-
Download data is not yet available.
- References
-
Adler, J., and Levin, M. (2002), “Is the Generality Problem too General?” in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65(1): 87-97.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00184.x
Alston, W. (1995), “How to Think about Reliability” in Philosophical Topics (Spring) 23, 1-29.
Becker, K. (2007). “Epistemic luck and the generality problem”. Philosophical Studies 139(3), 355-366
https://doi.org/10.1007/S11098-007-9122-Z
Beebe, J. R. (2004), “The Generality Problem, Statistical Relevance and the Tri-Level Hypothesis”. Nous 38(1), 177-195.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2004.00467.
Bishop, M. A. (2010). Why the generality problem is everybody’s problem. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 151(2), 285–298.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40926824
Comesaña, J. A. (2006). Well-Founded Solution to the Generality Problem. Philosophical Stud 129, 27–47.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-3020-z
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (1998). “The Generality Problem for Reliabilism”. Philosophical Studies 89, 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004243308503
Feldman, R., and Conee, E. (2002). “Typing Problems”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65(1), 98-105.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00185.x
Goldman, A. I. (1979). “What is Justified Belief?” In Pappas, G. (ed.) Justification and Knowledge. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1-23.
Kappel, K. (2006), “A Diagnosis and Resolution to the Generality Problem”, Philosophical Studies 127: 525-560.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7805-2
Goldman, A. and Beddor, B. "Reliabilist Epistemology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reliabilism/
- Cover Image
-
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-06-10
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Copyright (c) 2026 Surajit Barua (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Similar Articles
- Mehedi Hassan, Krishnamurti’s Concept of Freedom: A Philosophical Study , NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences : Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
- Tulika Sutradhar, Into the root of Ethical Inquiry: The role of Sartre’s concept of the Other and Bad Faith , NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences : Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
- Dr. Raghunath Ghosh, The Advaita Critique of Vaiśeṣika Theory of Creation , NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences : Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
- Dr. Srobon K. Mondol, Is Use Enough? The Problem of Normativity in Wittgenstein’s Theory of Meaning , NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences : Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
- Tarak Nath Nandi, Kant's Educational Philosophy and the NEP 2020: A Critical Assessment , NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences : Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
- Poulami Banerjee, Nature of Being: A Comparative Analysis through the Lens of Rabindranath Tagore and Martin Heidegger , NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences : Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
