NBPAJAHS

A Critical Overview of Moral Absolutism and Moral Relativism: A Meta-Ethical Approach

Authors
  • Nibita Rajak

    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH BENGAL
    Author
Keywords:
Community, Morality, Objectivity, Moral Plurality, Moral Relativism, Moral Absolutism
Abstract

In today's world, a dominant question in meta-ethics is whether morality is absolute or relative. The main intention of this work is to highlight the contradiction between the two moral frames (moral absolutism and moral relativism) in a critical context. Both moral absolutism and relativism play a vital role in the development of ethical theory. Moral relativism is a relatively new moral paradigm that challenges moral absolutism. The reason for the conflict between moral absolutism and relativism is based on whether there is a single criterion of morality or whether the moral criterion is relative. Moral absolutism holds that a single criterion of morality applies to everyone. While moral relativism rejects this view, it argues that no single moral criterion applies universally. Instead, moral standards differ from person to person and community to community. These two issues are not merely theoretical; they have practical implications for human rights, global justice, intercultural dialogue, and moral disagreements. This paper aims to explore how people determine what is right and wrong, good and bad, in light of these two doctrines. It also seeks to analyse the debate critically by examining its conceptual foundations, philosophical arguments, and the limitations of both doctrines.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References

Baghramian, M. (2004). Relativism. London. New York: Routledge,

Centore, F.F. (2000). Two Views of Virtue: Absolute Relativism and Relative Absolutism.

Greenwood Press.

Cook, J.W. (1999). Morality and Cultural Differences. New York: Oxford University Press.

Harman, G., & Thomson, J.J. (1996). Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity. Blackwell Publishers.

Harman, G. (2000). Explaining Value and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. UK: Oxford University Press.

Kellenberger, J. (2001). Moral Relativism, Moral Diversity, and Human Relationships. The Pennsylvania State University.

Kreeft, P. (1999). A Refutation of Moral Relativism, Interviews with an Absolutist. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

Levy, N. (2002). Moral Relativism: A Short Introduction. Oneworld Publications.

Lukes, S. (1998). Moral Relativism. Picador.

Moser, P. K., & Carson, T.L. (2001). Moral Relativism: A Reader. UK: Oxford University Press.

Rachels, J. (2003). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill.

Tersman, F. (2006). Moral Disagreement. New York: Cambridge University Press.

W. Wood, A. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: Immanuel Kant. Yale University Press.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-02-18
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2026 Nibita Rajak (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

A Critical Overview of Moral Absolutism and Moral Relativism: A Meta-Ethical Approach. (2026). NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences , 2(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.65842/nbpa.v2.i1.004

Similar Articles

1-10 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.