The NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Science is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary quarterly journal designed to support academicians, research scholars, and social thinkers across various disciplines in enhancing their academic careers and achieving excellence through creative writing. This journal aims to benefit the academic community across all fields.
The journal's goal is not to prioritise the quantity of submissions but to emphasise quality. We are committed to ensuring that every publication is not only accessible to the writers but also esteemed by the academic community.
Aim & Scope
The aim and scope of this multidisciplinary journal encompass a wide range of topics within the arts, humanities, and social sciences. It seeks to foster an inclusive dialogue among scholars, practitioners, and the wider public, encouraging innovative research and critical perspectives that explore the complexities of human experience. By bridging various disciplines, the journal aims to highlight the interconnectedness of these fields and promote interdisciplinary collaboration and insight. Submissions are welcome from diverse theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches, aiming to advance knowledge and understanding across cultural, historical, and social contexts. This journal serves as a platform for original research, reviews, and discussions, contributing to the vibrant discourse that shapes the arts, humanities, and social sciences today.
Open Access Policy
This Journal is an open-access journal. Open-access journals have revolutionised the landscape of academic publishing, enabling the broader dissemination of knowledge and research findings. An open-access journal is defined by its commitment to making research freely available to the public, thereby removing barriers to access that often accompany traditional subscription-based journals. This model not only enhances the visibility of research but also promotes collaboration among scholars and institutions worldwide. One of the key benefits of open-access journals is their ability to reach a wider audience. Scholars, practitioners, and the general public can access high-quality research without the need for expensive subscriptions or institutional affiliations.
The peer review process is a vital component of scholarly publishing that ensures the quality, validity, and originality of research published in the NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences. It provides an objective evaluation of manuscripts and helps authors improve their work through constructive feedback.
2. Type of Peer Review
The NBPA Journal for Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences follows a Double-Blind Peer Review process:
The identity of the reviewers is concealed from the authors.
The identity of the authors is also concealed from the reviewers. This approach maintains impartiality and reduces potential bias in the evaluation process.
3. Review Process
Initial Screening: Each submission is first assessed by the Editorial Team for suitability, originality, ethical compliance, and adherence to journal guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet basic standards may be returned or rejected before peer review.
Reviewer Selection: Qualified experts in the relevant field are invited to review the manuscript. Reviewers are selected based on subject expertise, publication record, and absence of conflict of interest.
Evaluation Criteria: Reviewers evaluate manuscripts on the basis of:
Originality and significance of the research
Clarity of objectives and methodology
Soundness of analysis and interpretation
Relevance and contribution to the field
Appropriateness of references and language quality
Review Timeline: Reviewers are typically given 2–4 weeks to complete their review. Extensions may be granted upon request.
Decision Categories: Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editorial decision may be:
Accept
Minor Revision
Major Revision
Reject
Revision and Resubmission: Authors are expected to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewers’ comments and submit a detailed response letter indicating how each issue has been addressed.
Final Decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on reviewers’ comments, authors’ revisions, and the journal’s editorial standards.
AI Writing Policy for Authors
The journal's editorial board recognises that Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can assist researchers in improving language, grammar, and readability. However, the use of AI must follow strict ethical and academic standards to ensure the originality, reliability, and integrity of scholarly publications.
a. Acceptable Use of AI Tools
Authors may use AI-assisted tools (such as grammar checkers, language editing tools, or translation software) for:
Improving grammar, spelling, and language clarity
Formatting references and citations
Language translation and editing assistance
AI tools should only assist in writing and must not replace the author’s intellectual contribution.
b. Prohibited Use
The following uses of AI are not permitted:
Generating entire manuscripts or substantial sections of the research paper
Creating falsified data, references, or citations
Producing fabricated results, tables, or images
Submitting AI-generated content without verification
Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the manuscript.
c. Disclosure Requirement
If AI tools are used during manuscript preparation, authors must clearly disclose their use in the Acknowledgement section of the manuscript.
Example statement:
“The author(s) used AI-assisted tools for language editing and grammar improvement. All intellectual content, analysis, and conclusions are the responsibility of the author(s).”
d. Authorship
AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors because they cannot take responsibility for the content, accuracy, or ethical standards of the research.
e. Editorial Screening
All submitted manuscripts may be screened using AI detection and plagiarism detection software. If a manuscript is found to contain excessive AI-generated or plagiarized content, the submission may be:
Rejected immediately, or
Returned to the author for revision.
f. Author Responsibility
Authors are fully responsible for:
Ensuring originality of the work
Verifying the accuracy of all references and data
Ensuring that AI tools have not introduced errors, fabricated citations, or misleading content.
g. Ethical Compliance
The use of AI must comply with the journal’s policies on:
Academic integrity
Research ethics
Plagiarism prevention.
Failure to follow this policy may result in rejection, retraction, or other editorial actions.
Article Processing Fees (APC)
To maintain the quality, sustainability, and smooth operation of our publication process, the Editorial Board has introduced a nominal publication contribution of ₹1500 for all Indian citizens, $35 for any foreign Scholar, and ₹1000 for all Life members of NBPA. This APC charge is only applicable to accepted articles.
This contribution will assist in covering editorial, technical, and administrative costs, ensuring that our journal continues to uphold high academic and ethical standards in publishing.
We are deeply grateful for your cooperation and invaluable contribution to the growth of our journal and the academic community it serves.
To pay the fees, please contact nbpajournal@gmail.com.
